From Genome Analysis Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
74 bytes added
, 07:06, 8 April 2011
Line 8: |
Line 8: |
| The imputation quality of both approaches is comparable. | | The imputation quality of both approaches is comparable. |
| | | |
− | If you are carrying out only an one-time imputation and you are focusing only on autosomes - then go with MaCH. | + | If you are carrying out only an one-time imputation, using a reference panel with <200 haplotypes and focusing only on autosomes - then go with MaCH. |
− | | |
− | If you are planning to re-impute into new reference panels frequently and/or you are interested into the X-chromosome - then minimac is the right choice for you.
| |
| | | |
| + | If you are using a large reference panel, planning to re-impute your data as new reference panels become available or interested in X-chromosome imputation - then minimac is the right choice for you. |
| | | |
| [[Image:Imputation_approaches.png|border]] | | [[Image:Imputation_approaches.png|border]] |
| | | |
| [[Image:Time.png|border]] | | [[Image:Time.png|border]] |
− |
| |
| | | |
| == Getting Started == | | == Getting Started == |