From Genome Analysis Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
51 bytes added
, 06:17, 26 April 2011
Line 8: |
Line 8: |
| The imputation quality of both approaches is comparable. | | The imputation quality of both approaches is comparable. |
| | | |
− | If you are carrying out only an one-time imputation, using a reference panel with <200 haplotypes and focusing only on autosomes - then go with MaCH. | + | If you are carrying out only an one-time imputation, using a reference panel with <200 haplotypes and focusing only on autosomes - then go with MaCH. If you are using a large reference panel, planning to re-impute your data as new reference panels become available or interested in X-chromosome imputation - then minimac is the right choice for you. |
| | | |
− | If you are using a large reference panel, planning to re-impute your data as new reference panels become available or interested in X-chromosome imputation - then minimac is the right choice for you.
| + | Since the current 1000G reference set includes 500+ European haplotypes, you'll probably be better off using [[minimac]]. |
− | | |
− | [[Image:Imputation_approaches.png|border]] | |
− | | |
− | [[Image:Time.png|border]]
| |
| | | |
| == Getting Started == | | == Getting Started == |